ANNEX A TO PART I

International Politics in the Post-Second Impact Era 
by Dr Horaki Hikari 
First Year Undergraduate Lecture Synposis (2027)
International Relations Department 
University of Tokyo-3 

Introduction

   The past three decades have seen dramatic changes in the 
international landscape - a greatly enhanced United Nations, the 
relative decline of the twentieth century great powers and the rise 
of challengers to the old status quo, the nuclear destruction of an 
entire sub-continent, the marginalization of oil and the Middle East,
the advent of the 'technology of God' - all have their roots in what
is perhaps the most significant event in modern human history, that
is, the Second Impact. Having narrowly avoided a Third Impact in 2015,
the exposure of the 'Instrumentality Project' has only served to 
accelerate existing trends. Due to the active role in this conspiracy
played by the major national governments, the very credibility of the 
nation-state as a form of governance has been severely weakened, even 
in liberal democracies.

   To the scholar of International Relations, these changes have
serious implications that strike at the roots of the international
system. How much independence can states retain? Will the United
Nations become a world government, laying down the law to the members
of the international community? What further technological innovations
will alter the geopolitical balance of power? How will the old great
powers cope with systemic change? 

   These questions are of great importance not just because of their 
effect on high politics but how ordinary people live their lives. 
Just take yourselves as examples. Those interested in government and
politics must consider which bodies - the prefectural assembly, the 
nation-state or the UN - will best serve your community and the general
interest. Our budding bankers and financiers will take an active part
in the changing economic balance among the nations of the world and 
closely watch the activities of the mighty mega-corporations that owe 
allegiance to no particular nation-state. Those joining the military
have other options besides that of their national armed forces - the
UN International Peacekeeping Force or the commercial direct action 
forces. Perhaps some of you will even decide to enter academia and be
lecturing to students at this very podium a few years from now.

   During the next nine weeks, I will be covering the following areas:
the various schools of thought in IR; sovereignty, nationalism and the 
state; diplomacy and war; international law; the First and Second
Treaties of Valentine and the evolution of the United Nations; the 
mega-corporations as international actors; the international political
economy and finally changes and continuities in the international
system. It is my hope that this introductory course will, at the very
least, broaden your horizons and maybe encourage you to take up further
courses with this department. 

   Karl Marx said that "The philosophers have only interpreted the
world, in various ways, the point, however, is to change it." You,
all of you, hold the world and the future in your hands. With your 
heart in the right place and with effort and understanding, it is 
within your power to shape it. Thank you.

ANNEX A TO PART II

International Politics in the Post-Second Impact Era 
by Dr Horaki Hikari 
First Year Undergraduate Lecture Synposis (2027)
International Relations Department 
University of Tokyo-3 

First and Second Treaties of Valentine
and the Rise of the United Nations

 The Second Impact (13 Sep 2000) resulted in massive loss of life
and destruction due mainly to the sudden rise in sea levels and the
catasphrohic effect on climate. In its aftermath, there was widespread 
crop failure and disruption of the transportation of food and other 
necesities that modern industrial society had come to take for granted.
The ensuing chaos tempted many states to resort to military force so as
to ensure their own survival, as well as to settle old scores or to 
improve their relative position.

 Most notable were the outbreak of hostilities between India and
Pakistan on 15 Sep 2000. It rapidly escalated into a full-blown nuclear 
conflagration that has left the South Asian sub-continent as a charred
wasteland and reduced a major civilization into insignificance. The
other was the annihilation of Tokyo by the new Non-Nuclear (N2) device
on 20 Sep 2000. Japan, after the horrors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was
the first country in the world to be at the receiving end of another
technological leap in destructive power. Since documents and witness 
accounts relating to these events are extremely sparse, it is still
contentious as to who started it or who was at fault. What was certain
that a continued zero-sum struggle among the nation-states of the world
would result in further calamities.

 As such, the First Treaty of Valentine was signed at the United
Nations in New York on 14 Feb 2001. Its most significant provisions
centralized the military resources of the world under the direction of
the Security Council and organized by the previously neglected Military
Staff Committee. Economic disputes were referred to the Economic and
Social Council (ECOSOC) and legal disputes subject to the mandatory
jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Though
hailed as a step towards international, if not world, government, in
retrospect, it was really a victory for the Great Powers. Particularly
the permanent members of the Security Council (USA, Russia, UK, France
and China) who would dominate all the important organs of the UN. Japan
was compensated by an agreement to shift the headquarters of the United
Nations to Tokyo-2 in 2007. Germany was bought off with increased
control over a more closely integrated European Union. As the Eva 
Conspiracy was to show, the fate of the world was decided amongst a 
select elite amongst the Great Powers.

 In the wake of the revelations of the Eva conspiracy, public 
confidence in their governments collapsed. In the leading countries,
a handful of men had agreed to man's evolution into a single perfect
being through a Third Impact. Though the UN had played a major role
in the cover up behind the Second Impact in its 2002 report (which
stated that it was the result of a meteorite collision), that was
seen to be due to its lack of independence and resources - a result
of Great Power manipulation. The world looked to a new saviour, a
more rational form of government - the new United Nations that was
born on 14 Feb 2016. Many of the reforms of the First Valentine Treaty
were retained but efforts were directed to break the monopoly of
control by the Great Powers.

 The Security Council was 'rationalized' as the British and French
permanent seats were merged into a European Union permanent seat. The 
veto was modified into a 'half-veto', requiring the 'nay' votes of at
least two of the permanent members before a resolution would fail. The 
Japanese gained a permanent seat at long last. The developing world 
was represented by Brazil, Nigeria, South Africa and Indonesia. The 
practical reality of India's almost total destruction prevented it 
from becoming a permanent member as well. The decline of the Middle East 
due mainly to the petroleum substitute developed by the Quetzalcoatl
Corporation will be discussed in the mega-corp/transnationalism
lecture.

 The United Nations was given greater independence and legitimacy
through a creation of a directly elected Representative Assembly which 
could check the inter-governmental organs. The Secretariat was given
executive powers and made responsible to both the Security Council
and the Representative Assembly. A UN International Peacekeeping Force
was created. Its buildup is causing controversy today as states try to 
minimize its effectiveness and thus claw back power from the UN. 
However the UN's real teeth lies in its command over HERZ (previously 
NERV) and its force of six Evangelions. No force can defeat Eva in the 
field but Eva alone cannot occupy a country. This was the logic of a 
compromise over control of HERZ which remains a truly autonomous UN 
agency. It is no longer above the law as it was during the Angel 
emergency period.

 In conclusion, the First and Second Treaties represent important
advances on the road to an international government. But my own
position is that it is an 'incomplete' revolution. The UN still lacks
the preponderance of force and power to overawe the states and that
represents serious potential for future conflict.


END OF PART II

ANNEX A TO PART V

International Politics in the Post-Second Impact Era 
by Dr Horaki Hikari 
First Year Undergraduate Lecture Synposis (2027)
International Relations Department 
University of Tokyo-3 

Schools of Thought in International Relations

   International political theory is extremely diverse and complex.
For the purposes of a rough overview, I will introduce a few 'schools'
that I regard as being particularly significant.

   STATISM. Their intellectual forefathers are Niccolo Machiavelli
and Thomas Hobbes. It was the dominant mode of thought in the 20th C
and continues to dominate the thinking of the governments of the Great
Powers. The nation-state is regarded as the supreme form of political
community, demanding the unquestioned loyalty and devotion of its
citizens. It recognizes no authority over itself and jealously guards
its sovereignty and independence from enroachment. But how does an 
abstract entity have moral precedence over a real flesh-and-blood
individual? Is the basic building block of the international system
the human being or an creature of the human imagination? 

   SUPRANATIONALISM. Their philosopher is Thomas Hobbes. An overarching
world government to impose order on the anarchical relations of the
nation-states. Emphasizing order, discipline, obedience and conformity,
they see a single world-state as the solution to achieve lasting peace
and stability. The modern United Nations is seen as an embryonic 
Leviathan in this mold. I would ask: What constitutes a just peace?
Is there room for moral change? Will such power corrupt and bring about
a world tyranny?

   TRANSCENDENTALISM. Christ and Marx find themselves in good company.
The latter is a more limited transcendentalist. The Communist Utopia
is the end of history and the end of politics. The pinnacle of human
achievement. All the questions of want and war are resolved. Politics
is merely something to be endured on the road to the worker's paradise.
The former promises a world beyond this one. Politics is irrelevant
except for where it might affect the immortal soul. Yet from this
tradition we have derived the most worldly of doctrines: the separation
of church and state, the theory of the just war, the basic equality of
man. The transcendentalists seek an escape from this world. What is
the value of the world as it is to them?

   TRANSNATIONALISM. The principle thinker of this school is Immanuel
Kant. The wider community of cosmopolitan man comes about. The
nation-state is no longer able to provide adequately for the security
and welfare of its denizens. The world citizen sees a responsibility
to his fellow human being beyond that of nationality, race, creed,
language or culture. The international organization, the functional
agency and the multi-national company are its vanguard, the nation-
state is merely one actor amongst many in providing for human needs. A 
harmony of interest is created amidst enlightened self-interest and 
thus it is hoped that perpetual peace will reign.

   Do be cautious about labelling the work of authors and scholars.
Mental categories are convenient starting points for those grappling
with them as tools of analysis but one should strive to be aware of
their subtleties. An ordinary mind separates out white and black.
Going further, the keen mind appreciates the grey.

END OF PART V

International Politics in the Post-Second Impact Era 
by Dr Horaki Hikari 
First Year Undergraduate Lecture Synposis (2027)
International Relations Department 
University of Tokyo-3 

Beyond the State: the Mega-Corporations

   Nation-states have traditionally been the focus of International
Relations. High politics, diplomacy, trade agreements, treaties and
war are all features of inter-state interaction. However, in the
wake of the Second Impact, the international institution has come to
the foreground as an actor in international relations that equals and
may some day even exceed the nation-state. In today's lecture, I 
wish to consider another actor that has much promise in challenging
the primacy of the nation-state in the international arena.

   The mega-corporation is by no means a new phenomenon. In the 17th
Century, the bankers of Italy decided which kings could finance wars
or buy titles. In the 19th Century, the House of Rothschild were the
bankers of the powers of the Congress of Vienna. They had such an 
excellent system of information gathering and transmission that the
Rothschild brother based in London was the first person in England to
know of Nelson's victory at Tragflagar. In the 20th Century, we saw
of the House of Morgan that had more funds that half of the countries
in the world then. The Rockfeller empire of Standard Oil, even after
being broken up, continued to dominate the oil industry. General Motors
employed more people than the populations of several small countries
put together.

   But in the 21st Century, the mega-corporation can be distinguished
from the old multinational corporation. They have the potential to be
truly transational. (See forthcoming academic paper to be published by
H.Horaki, Global Cities and Transnational Cosmopolitanism.) Another
salient point is that mega-corporations have actively should to change
the way the world works instead of simply working within the existing
system. Employing their vast resources and technological prowess, they
have nudged the nation-states in the direction of a different world. 

   A classic example was the Quetzalcoatl Corporation which is based
in Sao Paolo, Brazil. Their most notable achievement was to develop a
hydrocarbon fuel subsitute for petroleum. They had developed a fuel 
from a mix of biomass and refuse that could be produced cheaply in the
tropical regions of the world. In addition, it was a sustainable form
of energy and its production reduced greenhouse gas emissions as well
as actually absorbing carbon oxides from the atmosphere in the process.
Against tremendous resistance from the automobile industry and the oil
majors, Quetzalcoatl manage to lobby for stricter environment laws and
emission standards which in turn resulted in consumer acceptance of
the new fuel and its accompanying implications for the old internal 
combustion engine. The resulting drastic fall in the demand for oil
has seen the decline of much of the Middle East that failed to 
diversify from oil. Oil producers like Venezuela and Nigeria now have
possess both biomass and petroleum production facilities.

   In the world of services and information, the Hathor News 
Organization has become an important force in international media,
providing news and entertainment throughout the globe through digital,
satelite and internet links - which Microsoft had planned to do before
being broken up by the anti-trust authorities in 2000. Hathor's ability
to reach a worldwide audience 24 hours a day was pivotal to its major 
coup of exposing the Eva conspiracy and Instrumentality Project to the
people of the world in 2015. Its transnational character has made it 
relatively independent of national censorship.

   Before concluding, another important development is the 'Ted Turner'
effect. In 1998, the media mogul donated US $1 billion to the United
Nations over a period of 10 years. Contributions by the mega-corps to
the UN has now become a regular event. Being no longer hostage to the
disruptive antics of non-payment by the great powers, this has helped 
the UN make good on the promise of the Second Treaty of Valentine, for
more effective and just international government.

END OF PART VI

ANNEX A TO PART VII

Dr Horaki Hikari's personal notes:
 
CHARTER OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Chapter I
Article 2(4)

All Members shall refrain in their international relations
from the threat or use of force against the territorial
integrity or political independence of any State, or in any
manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Article 2(7)

Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize 
the United Nations to intervene in matters which are 
essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any State
or shall require the Members to submit such matters to
settlement under the present Charter; but this principle
shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures
under Chapter VII.

Chapter VII
Article 39

The Security Council shall determine the existence of any
threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of
aggression and shall make recommendations, or decide what
measures shall be taken in accordance with Articles 41 and
42, to maintain or restore international peace and security. 

Article 48(1)
The action required to carry out the decisions of the
Security Council for the maintenance of intenrational peace
and security shall be taken by all members of the United
Nations or by some of them, as the Security Council may
determine.

Article 48(2)
Such decisions shall be carried out by the Members of the
United Nations directly and through their action in the
appropriate international agencies of which they are
members.

The Emergency Clauses of the Second Treaty of Valentine were
written to empower the United Nations International Peace-
keeping Force (UNIPF) to be granted the powers vested in 
the Security Council. Given the complicity of most of the
Great Powers in the Eva Conspiracy, it only seemed the 
logical thing to do. However, a body independent of the
member-states with the authority and resources to carry 
out enforcement measures has grave implications for the
traditional system of state sovereignty - which might not
be such a bad thing.


END OF PART VII